Structural Functionalism Vs Conflict Theory Essay Ideas

Functionalism Vs Conflict Theory Essay

The theory of functionalism and conflict theory differ in several ways. They focus on different values, assume different things about society and differ in their explanations of power. Functionalism is defined as ?the analysis of social and cultural phenomena in terms of the functions they perform in a sociocultural system.

In functionalism society is conceived as a system of interrelated parts in which no part can be understood in isolation from the whole (Wallace, Wolf, 18).? On the other hand conflict theorists do not agree with the unity in society that functionalist believe in. ?Conflict theorists see an arena in which groups fight for power (Wallace, Wolf, 68).?These two theories create very different ways of looking at the world but each have strong points and evidence to back them up. Functionalism emphasizes the interdependence of the system?s parts. Contributions made by the shared values link to the existence of the social system, and the equilibrium among the interrelated parts.

The theory of functionalism values the integration of all parts of society. It also values a normal state of affairs or equilibrium (Wallace, Wolf 1998). Additionally it focuses on the society as a whole instead of individuals.

Functionalism has two major grounds. The first is the analysis of societies by analogy with biological organisms. The other is the assessment of social institutions in terms of the role and function they play in a social system. An example of the analysis of societies is society is a social organism, and the human body is a biological organism. There are four aspects of society. Economic, political, legal, and the social system, they come together to form and maintain society.

There were several early supporters of functionalism. These men developed the concepts and ideas that founded this theory. Auguste Comte is known as the founder of sociology and was the first to show society as a social organism because of the interdependence of all the parts of society. Herbert Spencer was also a major forerunner of this theory because of his idea of differentiation. By this ?Spencer meant the mutual dependence of unlike parts of the system (Wallace, Wolf, 1998). ? Talcott Parsons set out four functional basics important for society: these are goal attainment, setting goals in Government/Education, Adaptation, development of material world in the Mass Media/Industry, Integration in promoting harmony and social solidarity in Religion/Family, Latency, meeting individual needs to satisfy demand.

Emile Durkheim is known as the father of functionalism. ?He is the most important sociological forerunner of modern functionalism (Wallace, Wolf 1998).? Durkheim viewed progress as a movement from automatic unity of family based societies to the natural...

Loading: Checking Spelling

0%

Read more

The Plausibility of Analytic Functionalism Essay

2109 words - 8 pages The tenets of analytic functionalism worked well at attempting to align the philosophies of behaviorism and the identity theory, and though there are many objections to the theory’s method of formulaic definition of mental states, I find that analytic functionalism is a plausible theory that describes the mind. I find that in determining a means in which to define mental states, analytic functionalism demonstrates an ontological method in which...

Structural Funcionalism, Conflict Theory, and Symbolic Interactionism

1640 words - 7 pages In this paper, I will discuss three different schools of thought that, while they may seem to explain the inner workings of society, by themselves they fail to satisfy completely. For each theory, I will discuss the basics and cover the main tenants of each. Then, I will discuss the ambiguities, inadequacies and irrelevance to reality based on our current understanding of modern society. Structural Functionalism In the Functionalist School of...

Sociological Theories

1327 words - 5 pages Sociological theory creates ways to understand the social world by having different theories to explain understand social life. It aids to make sense of this social world. It draws together a wide range of perspectives to help provide the fullest picture. (Macionis & Plummer p.36) It shows that one theory can explain something that another cannot. My aim is to answer this question with reference to both functionalism and conflict theory. ...

Social Structure

888 words - 4 pages Soc100-125Topic: Social StructureIn order for us to understand why sociological theories could be classified into 'consensus' and 'conflict' perspectives it may be best to first define these concepts. Consensus is a concept of society in which the absence of conflict is seen as the equilibrium state of society based on a general or widespread...

Define the sociological theory. Describe 2 Theories

830 words - 3 pages Define the sociological theory. Discuss in details three characteristics each of one macro and one micro sociological theory. Using at least 2 examples, explain how each theory aids in the understanding of social behaviour?Sociological theory is defined as the study of human being and how they interact with society. It can also...

In this essay I will describe two sociological perspectives; I will also explain the similarities and differences between two of the main theories functionalism and Marxism.

882 words - 4 pages Functionalism and Marxism are traced back to theories adopted by sociologists in the nineteenth century. Marxism came from the German philosopher Karl Marx (1818-1883), whereas Functionalism was originally derived by Auguste Compte (1798-1857). It was then developed further by Emile Durkheim (1858-1917).Functionalist theories portray society as a...

Functionalisms.

1110 words - 4 pages . FunctionalismFunctionalists see shared norms and values as being fundamental to society. They focus on social order based on understood agreements and view social change as occurring in a slow and orderly fashion. Their primary concern is with large-scale social structures and institutions of society, their interrelationships and their...

The Pros and Cons of Functionalism and Marxism

2816 words - 11 pages The two theoretical approaches I have chosen to compare to the study of crime are Functionalism and Marxism. I have done so, as I believe both theories are important/ significant to the study of crime and differentiate from each other. I will do this by writing a critique the advantages and disadvantages of both of the theories and thus, resulting in my own personal opinion in the conclusion. Marxism derived from German philosophers Karl...

Functionalist View of Society

596 words - 2 pages Society shapes the individual and not the individual that shapes society. What is meant by that is that we are all products of our upbringings and learn through socialization what our beliefs are, what we agree on personally and often shared beliefs and the understanding of what is the "norm." Through our primary interaction with others beginning at home and continuing onto school, college and work, our beliefs aren't always set in stone and...

Functionalist theory

865 words - 3 pages Erika Schafer Assignment 1 Due 9/14/14 Structural FunctionalismThe functionalist theory focuses on society as a system of interrelated institutions and structures that are designed to address human needs. They view society as functioning best when there is agreement about the social values and norms. The functionalist...

Functionalism Theory of Education

1389 words - 6 pages There are three main theoretical perspectives (or theories) that represent the views of sociologist and educators, these views are the conflict perspective, symbolic interactions, and functionalism. Although all of these theories are important to education and society, I have chosen to focus my research or theoretical perspective on functionalism also including the effects functionalism and education. The Functionalist perspective is one of the...

...Functionalism is the original and still dominant discipline of thought in the social sciences. As a construct of two forms of scientific investigation: the scientific approach and viewing the individual as a part of a social organism or social whole, the scientific method considers society as an objectively observable and "real" entity that is suitable for methods and philosophies that guide examination and study of the physical world. The 17th century philosopher, Thomas Hobbes, believed that humans are driven by passion, which if left unrestrained would result in social chaos. The problem, therefore, is to explain why this does not routinely occur. For functionalists, it is society, as its own entity that regulates human behavior. Emile Durkheim, the originator of this school of thought described society as a "conscious being... with it's own special nature, distinct from that of it's members". The consequence of this assumption that society is a 'social fact' that regulates human activity is that functionalists stress how human behavior is positively determined by social structure. Functionalism holds that everyone and everything in society, no matter how strange it may seem, serves a purpose. Crime, for example, is viewed almost universally as a nuisance. Functionalists, however, point out that crime serves several purposes. Crime creates the need for the employment of police officers, criminal investigators, prosecutors, defense...

Categories: 1

0 Replies to “Structural Functionalism Vs Conflict Theory Essay Ideas”

Leave a comment

L'indirizzo email non verrà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *